Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Blunders and Bother over Google Buzz

Monday, February 15th, 2010

We internet speed freaks are getting a bit more savvy about our privacy, which is why even though Google Buzz only just launched this week, already users have privacy concerns, changes have already been made, and more are sure to come.

The L.A. Times Technology blog put it this way: “Displaying lists of users’ friends is standard practice in social networks, but detractors are more concerned with Google Buzz because it’s based on e-mail, a more private means of communication. And since Google Buzz automatically adds a person’s most-contacted individuals to follower lists, it potentially sheds too much light on a user’s e-mail exchanges.”

Eeek!  Here’s what some people were quoted as saying in a follow-up article:

• “Don’t set up a new application and have me ‘following’ a bunch of randoms from my address book. That’s not a ‘feature,’ that’s a ‘mistake.’ ”

• “I use my private Gmail account to e-mail my boyfriend and my mother. There’s a BIG drop-off between them and my other ‘most frequent’ contacts. You know who my third most frequent contact is? My abusive ex-husband.”

• “This is one of Google’s biggest blunders,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

He went on to explain that Google might have overreached as it attempted to break into the competitive social networking space, in which it has been outpaced and outmaneuvered by Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc.

“When you sign up for Facebook, you expect certain things. When you sign up for Twitter, you expect certain things. When you sign up for Gmail, you expect e-mail. So when Google turned people’s e-mail contact list into their social network friends list, they got understandably upset,” he said.

Google says it has tweaked Buzz, and may separate it from Gmail.

The Old Guard Bows to the New

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Yahoo! announced this morning that it is adding Facebook Connect across many of its properties. This afternoon Google Friend Connect announced the inclusion of Twitter as a top-level log-in option. These moves will be convenient for users, but may not be good for the future of the web, according to Read Write Web.

They say it’s a matter of identity.  “Identity is a very important matter online, particularly as everything becomes more social. Online identity is your address book, it’s your wallet, it’s your reputation and it could become a lot more. Increasingly, you take that Identity from site to site, leveraging on the next site what you did on the last one. If a particular company provides that Identity for you, it sets the rules, regulations, “interest rates” (eg. use of your info for advertising) and determines things like what parts of your identity you can use on different sites and what parts you can’t.

“Facebook and Twitter are becoming big Identity providers. Google and Yahoo! have wanted to be leading Identity providers themselves but today cried Uncle with a big nod to the supremacy of the two leading social networks. At this point they have an interest in doing so, because they want you to share what you do on Yahoo and Google sites with your big link-clicking network of friends on Facebook and Twitter. Google didn’t add Facebook Connect, just Twitter, because Facebook is now Google’s leading challenger.”

While it makes it convenient for the users, RWW feels that, “The short-term trade of giving more control to two big social networks, in exchange for traffic and ad money, may not serve anyone well in the long run.”

And once again, the world changes with internet speed.

Google Books Deal a Do Over

Friday, September 25th, 2009

We may have announced the time to rejoice over Google Book’s settlement a wee bit too soon.  As Miguel Helft wrote for the NY Times on Thursday, “As currently written, the controversial settlement between Google and groups representing publishers and authors is officially dead.”  But before you start ringing the bells of mourning, it seems a federal judge gave the parties time to negotiate a new deal!  Yay!  And one that would address some of the many objections filed by various groups.

The Authors Guild and the Association of American University Presses sued Google in 2005. They felt that Google’s plan to scan books from major libraries and make them available online constituted copyright infringement. After two years of negotiations, the parties announced the settlement in October 2008.

Judge Denny Chin (of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, if you must know) granted a motion to delay an October 7th hearing on the settlement. The motion was filed earlier this week by the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers, the plaintiffs in the case, and was unopposed by Google, the defendant.

In his order, Judge Chin indicated that he took seriously the long list of objections that various parties have raised about the agreement.

“The current settlement agreement raises significant issues, as demonstrated not only by the number of objections, but also by the fact that the objectors include countries, states, nonprofit organizations, and prominent authors and law professors,” Judge Chin wrote. “Clearly, fair concerns have been raised.”

Instead of the scheduled fairness hearing, Judge Chin asked the parties to convene in court on October 7th for a status conference to “determine how to proceed with the case as expeditiously as possible, as this case has now been pending for more than four years,” he wrote.

So, readers of digital books, keep your fingers crossed for this to be resolved with internet speed!

If Google got a Redesign

Monday, September 21st, 2009

WebMynd is a company that created an add-on that allows you to augment your Google searches with real-time Twitter updates, Wikipedia articles, YouTube videos, and results from dozens of other places. They’ve now launched a contest called RedesignGoogle.com that invites designers from around the world to give Google a makeover.

Designers are invited to revamp Google using any CSS modifications they’d like. The contest started accepting submissions already, and will continue to do so through November 1st. Then, a number of judges (which include Y Combinator’s Paul Graham, the WebMynd team and TechCrunch’s Jason Kincaid) will pick the best designs. The winners will take home a brand new MacBook Air. You can find more details on WebMynd’s blog.

Jason Kincaid says, “The nice thing about the contest is that it isn’t purely theoretical — you’ll actually be able to start using the new design in your browser, using a stripped down version of WebMynd’s browser plugin.” Now that’s working with internet speed!

You can see a full gallery of submissions thus far at RedesignGoogle.com.  But others are wondering if Google really needs a redesign.  Our Wired World blog says “It seems that the colour and image friendly Bing search is causing a stir in the imagination of Google users…. I like Google the way it is. Neat and simple.” And the Tech Superb blogger says, “Let me point out emphatically that Google is what it is today not only because of the highest quality of its search engine but also because of simplicity of its design.”

So sure, have fun, redesign Google for yourself, but maybe leave the original for everyone else.

Google Really Big in India and Brazil

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

“Google’s dominance of the Internet in the United States is hard to overstate,”  says Miguel Helft of the New York Times.  According to his information from comScore, in the U.S. Google is No. 1 in areas like maps and blogging, accounts for two-thirds of all Web searches, and they own YouTube which is 10 times more popular than its nearest competitor. Over all, Internet users in the United States spend 9 percent of their time online on some Google service. Globally this average is 9.4 percent.

But in two global markets growing with internet speed, Google is even more dominant. In terms of Internet use globally, India is ranked seventh, and Brazil ninth. But In Brazil, Google accounts for nearly 30 percent of people’s online minutes and about 29 percent in India.

Google’s social network, which has been a failure pretty much everywhere else in the world, is No. 1 in those two countries.

In Brazil, Google captures nearly 90 percent of all searches, 71 percent of the time spent on maps (compared with just 42 percent here in the U.S.) and 43 percent of the time spent on blogs (compared with 30 percent here).

In India, it represents 88 percent of searches, 64 percent of maps and 48 percent of blogs. Gmail accounts for nearly half of the Indian Web e-mail market, compared with just 6.4 percent in the U.S..

“Part of the explanation was that Google emerged onto the scene at the time these markets were developing,” says Andrew Lipsman, director of industry analysis for comScore. “As Google became the default search engine, the brand extended to these other services.”

But Google has not been able to beat local brands in China, the Internet market with the most users, where it lags behind Baidu. In Russia, Yandex is the leading search engine.