Archive for June, 2010

Social Media Buzz and TV Ratings

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Though it seems more Twitter buzz equals a better box office for movies, the same can’t be said of social networking and television ratings.

A social media monitoring company called Viralheat spent a month comparing the amount of mentions about a TV show on social networks with their Neilsen ratings. And they found that online buzz on its own was not a good enough indicator. What made the difference was the sentiment expressed.

If you take a look at the chart on Mashable.com, you’ll see that Lost viewers weren’t many, but they had a lot to say – and half of it was not good. But Dancing with the Stars had great ratings with very little said about it online.

Perhaps it also has something to do with the age range of the viewers versus the ages of those who like to make the most of internet speed.

But it’s not even that simple. The results for the show Glee, a program aimed at a younger audience, reveal that though the ratings weren’t great, the buzz online was pretty good. On the other hand, American Idol skews pretty young too, and there wasn’t even as much buzz online about it as there was for Glee. American Idol is old, Glee is new…who knows what the difference is? The other shows on the chart that show little online chatter and good ratings were NCIS, Two and a Half Men, Cold Case, The Mentalist and Desperate Housewives – all shows that are on later at night and aimed at an older audience.

We’ll leave it up to the research guys to figure it all out.

A Win for Internet Freedom

Monday, June 28th, 2010

When Viacom, the global media company that own brands like CBS, MTV, Paramount Pictures, and Showtime, sued YouTube for copyright infringement, they wanted huge amounts of money to rectify  what they called “brazen disregard of the intellectual property laws,” according to Ars Technica

eBay, Facebook, Yahoo, and Ask.com all weighed in on the side of internet freedom and democracy with Google, who owns YouTube.

Now, Ars Technica reports that “The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has rejected Viacom’s claim that Google’s premier video site was guilty of massive copyright infringement. Instead, the court has granted Google’s motion for summary judgment and asserted that YouTube fully qualifies for ‘safe harbor’ protections under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.”  Whoo hoo!

On YouTube’s blog, Kent Walker, Vice President and General Counsel for Google, said, “This is an important victory not just for us, but also for the billions of people around the world who use the web to communicate and share experiences with each other. We’re excited about this decision and look forward to renewing our focus on supporting the incredible variety of ideas and expression that billions of people post and watch on YouTube every day around the world.”

Of course, it seems as though Viacom intends to appeal the case. In the meantime, we net denizens can enjoy using internet speed in a virtual world that may just be a bit freer, thanks to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation who are out there defending our digital rights!

Kindle and Nook Compete for Your Dollar

Friday, June 25th, 2010

On one side you’ve got Apple’s new iPad, which can be an e-book reader, plus a lot more.  On the other side, the introduction of the Kobo, which offers only the ability to store and read books electronically.  The area between iPad and Kobo is where the Kindle and Nook are fighting for your attention. 

The iPad is selling for around $499, and the Kobo will be $149 when it becomes available in July through Borders. So the other retail book giants are trying to figure out exactly how much people would be willing to pay for an e-book reader with additional features.

Yahoo News reported, “Amazon has lowered the Kindle’s price several times since the e-reader with a grayscale screen debuted in 2007 at $399. In October, the online retailer dropped the price to $259 from $299. Amazon also sells a larger-screen Kindle, the Kindle DX, for $489. The Nook was released late last year for $259.”

On Monday afternoon, after Barnes & Noble reduced the price of the Nook to $199, Amazon cut the price of their Kindle to $189. The $149 Kobo has just the basics, but TechCrunch seems to think they do what they do pretty well.  So what does an extra $40 or $50 get you from the competitors? Access to internet speed and the ability to download books wirelessly, as well as features like bookmarks, dictionaries, and a wider variety of readable formats. 

But they’re not the only players in the game. Sony offers e-book readers as do many other companies, as you can see in an overwhelming grid comparison of e-book readers on Wikipedia.  Really, only a hands-on comparison can help you determine which one appeals most to you.

License Plates of the Future

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

California, a state deeply in debt (about $19 billion), is considering making money by selling digital advertising on car license plates. They’ll remain static, just showing the usual license plate number and registration while in motion, but if the car stops for more than 4 seconds, it could show any number of things while the license plate number fades into the background or minimizes, but it won’t disappear.  

Options include advertising sold through the Department of Motor Vehicles, emergency amber alerts or traffic information, or personalized messages like a favorite sports team or school affiliation.  The device would be controlled from inside the vehicle, but of course, emergency updates would have to be sent using Wi-Fi internet speed.

While it certainly could be distracting, it might also help entertain people during stop-and-go traffic. People who commented on the article posted on Yahoo made some good points:

• “How hard is it gonna be to steal that identification and put it on yours? Now I have to worry about my license plate going out?”
• “Will these plates have their own power source? Just what I need, something else to drain power from my car’s battery.”
• “I would only be for such and idea if it would pay for license, registration fees and full coverage insurance for me and my vehicles. Why should only the government benefit from ads displayed on my vehicle?”
• “What about people that use a small truck to pull a trailer? I routinely dent up my plate…”
• “I can’t stand people tracking me as it is, and I’m not going to voluntarily let them track me through my license plate.”

Twittering Sports Fans

Monday, June 21st, 2010

With the World Cup going on in South Africa and the NBA Championship in the U.S., Twitter has been busier than ever keeping up with all the fan tweets. Normally, there are 65 million posts per day at the rate of 750 messages per second.  That’s impressive in itself, but on Monday after Japan played against Cameroon, soccer fans posted 2,940 tweets per second, almost quadrupling the normal amount. 

A mere three days later, Lakers fans posted 3,085 tweets per second after their team won the championship against the Boston Celtics. That more than quadruples the normal amount.  What does it mean?  That there are more Laker-supporting Los Angelenos on Twitter than Celtics fans? Or that there are more basketball fans using Twitter than soccer fans?  Or was it just that there are fewer fans of the Japanese and Cameroon soccer teams who tweet than there are Twittering Laker fans? 

So people enjoy sharing info all over the world with internet speed, despite rumors that Twitter had reached a plateau. The New York Times BITS blog said that actually, “people were still using Twitter in increasing numbers, but doing it more from mobile devices and other Twitter apps than from Twitter’s own site. According to comScore, Twitter.com had 90.2 million unique visitors worldwide in May, up from 83.8 million in April and 37.3 million in May of last year.”

They went on to say that Twitter isn’t just for tech-geeks anymore, which means that sports fans better avert their eyes from whatever device they’re using if they’re recording a game to watch later and don’t want to know the outcome of a game before they’ve seen it for themselves!

Smoking Baby Shocks the World

Friday, June 18th, 2010

We can only hope that this use of internet speed to connect the world results in some new laws for child protection. After millions of viewings on YouTube, late night talk show hosts can’t escape making references to it and jokes about the Indonesian toddler who smokes cigarettes like a pro. The latest news is that the 2-year old has cut down from 40 cigarettes a day to only 15. Who is lighting these things for him? Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel pointed out that at least the kid can’t drive down to the store and get more on his own, so they should stop giving them to him. But apparently, little Ardi can’t even walk, he’s so out of shape. He rolls around on top of a toy truck.  Check out CNN’s interview with Ardi’s mom.

Gawker.com has more horrifying news for us on the smoking baby front. They say Ardi Rizal may not be alone. China’s Xinhua news agency reported  “Data from the Central Statistics Agency showed 25 per cent of Indonesian children aged three to 15 have tried cigarettes, with 3.2 per cent of those active smokers.” Gawker pointed out a three-year old in China who smokes and drinks three beers a day. “According to her mother—a professional collector and seller of rubbish—three-year-old Ya Wen fell into a five-day coma after a catastrophic car accident. When she awoke, she wanted nothing but cigarettes and booze. Little Ya Wen thieved packs from the local corner store, then graduated to stealing cash from her parents to buy her cancerous lollipops. She also likes to drink: “Three glasses of beer is no problem for her.”

Have a Starbucks with Free Wi Fi

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

How great is this?  Starting July 1st, Starbucks will be offering all customers at all of their company-owned locations FREE wireless internet access. The franchise stores aren’t in on the deal. But if they’re smart, they’ll join in the fun with internet speed. Why? Because it’s brilliant.

No more multi-step process to get online, or worrying if you’d exceeded the two-hour mark for free internet access with their Starbucks loyalty card. That’d mean you’d have to start paying $3.99 and hour. How much more encouraged will you be to choose the local Starbucks over elsewhere when you can get delicious and comparatively healthy food and beverages all day, plus good music and a nice clean atmosphere? 

Of course the above time limit probably helped to encourage people to move on and not take up space without buying more stuff. The thing is, Starbucks has been losing customers to McDonald’s ever since they started offering free wi-fi and cheaper McCafe coffee not long ago. 

Chris Brogan, president of a social media marketing agency called New Marketing Labs, blogged about it this way: “They said, ‘Not only do we have free Wi-Fi, but we’re going to offer this huge raft of digital products you can get while you’re here, and you like our coffee better anyway.’ ” That should be on Starbucks billboards!

The Starbucks Digital Network, will (eventually) sell you stuff online. For now, it hopes to attract people with free access to paid sites like The Wall Street Journal and Zagat, plus partnerships will allow them to offer free iTunes downloads and previews of not-yet-released movies and albums. They’ll also feature local content based on the location and help for job-seekers using Starbucks as their resume-sending base.

What the Google Street View Patrol Gathers

Monday, June 14th, 2010

The collection of images and data for Google’s Street View feature has brought up lots of interesting issues of privacy with internet speed.  They capture a lot of odd things when they’re out photographing neighborhoods, like a romantic moment between two teens, images of people going into adult book stores, feeding meters in front of strip clubs, and probably lots of other embarrassing things. Residents of one neighborhood in the UK actually blocked a Google Street View car from continuing through their town a year ago. 

Recently, Google admitted that while driving around collecting data about public Wi-Fi networks, they accidentally collected a lot of other unencrypted data too. They came clean about it, and said that the information hasn’t been looked at or used, but people are freaking out. People like the U.S. Government. According to Yahoo news:

Google said that any personal information inadvertently swept up in the process of mapping Wi-Fi networks was “not used to identify any specific individual or household” and was stored only in “raw, aggregate, binary form.” It added that “the payload data has never been used in any Google product or service, nor do we intend to use it.”

The company also said it is aware of only two Google engineers who have even seen the data: the engineer who designed the software used to process information about the Wi-Fi networks being mapped, and the engineer who tested the data that had been collected after the company learned of the problem.

For now, Google is retaining the data collected in the United States to comply with a court order stemming from pending civil litigation. The company has deleted data that came from Ireland, Denmark and Austria at the request of authorities in those countries.

No Photos for Google Searchers

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Turns out Google search users like all the white space. Google found this out over the course of the week, when their experiment to add large photos to the search page was answered by a sudden surge in the search term “remove google background”. When it became the seventh most popular search in the United States on their Google Trends tool, they got the picture (Get it? Picture?) with internet speed.

I guess if people wanted photos, they’d be using Bing. Of course Google wanted to one-up Bing by letting users choose their own photos – either from those provided by Google or from their own files – but this message didn’t make it out to the public, who only saw Google’s sample photos without an explanation. It might have been cool, if it weren’t so instantly hated. It’s too bad, it seems like they worked hard to make people happy.

Google’s vice president of search products and user experience, Marissa Mayer, wrote on the Google Blog, “We’ve collaborated with several well-known artists, sculptors and photographers to create a gallery of background images you can use to personalize your Google homepage.” Awww….that’s so nice! 

She added later, “We had planned to run an explanation of the showcase alongside it—in the form of a link on our homepage. Due to a bug, the explanatory link did not appear for most users. As a result, many people thought we had permanently changed our homepage, so we decided to stop today’s series early. We appreciate your feedback and patience as we experiment and iterate.”

BP is All Over the Web Too

Wednesday, June 9th, 2010

Some of the BP appearances online are from BP themselves, others are to express the outrage that most people feel, but you can bet that it’s all spreading around with internet speed.  On the outrage side, a Twitter account that pretends to be BP’s Global PR unit is actually bitter people with a sense of biting humor, (See it here:  http://twitter.com/bpglobalpr) posting tweets like: “Surprised ourselves by getting emotional on the coast today. Turns out the wind blew dispersant in our eyes. #BPrebrand”

Search for BP on Facebook and you’ll see that 258,684 people “like” the page called “Stop the oil spill by stuffing BP executives into the leaking pipe”. They’ve got a Twitter account @BPglobalBS.  A search for “Boycott BP” comes up with 474,103 people who like one page that teaches you how to say “boycott stations” in several languages, and an application with 10,534 users.

You can even download a Firefox plugin, that will cover any mention of BP in your Google searches with an oil puddle. See what it looks like in this article from Mashable.com

BP is trying to turn the tide (get it? An ocean reference?) of attention to a positive wash for them by buying up the sponsored links on Google and Yahoo searches so they’ll show up at the top of the page.  At least that’s what Mashable told us. When we search on either, we get news links first and find BP about 3 or 4 down, but with a link to their response to the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. Only time will tell if it’s enough.