Archive for September, 2009

Internet Phone Calls While In Flight

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

In an earlier post, we saw that Skyping from the Sky was possible, if not encouraged, while on flying.  But USA Today  tells us that many other countries allow and even promote it, since they make money from it. 

U.S., Federal regulations prohibit in-flight cell phone use because they may interfere with flight operations and create congestion in ground cell towers. But with many airlines offering inflight Wi-Fi, the issue of Internet-based phone calls has become an issue. Perhaps because it is possible to access VoIP services through cell phones these days, which further blurs the line. 

A bill in Congress currently seeks a similar ban on all in-flight voice communications by passengers. While airlines in Europe, Asia and the Middle East allow calls and have even taken it a step further by introducing pay-by-minute cellphone service using satellites. There are two companies in the USA that offer in-flight Internet service to airlines: Chicago-based Aircell and California-based Row 44. Both companies say the airlines have asked that Internet-based phone calls be blocked.

Frederick St. Amour, a business development executive at Row 44 says travelers making Internet phone calls “create competition for bandwidth” that could result in slower speed for other passengers. But how many passengers at a time would be using the service, especially if airlines are charging for it? 

It may be just another illustration of the ways in which America is falling behind in technology. American companies seem resistant to change and would rather ban the freedom to talk with internet speed while flying at jet speed than find a way to provide the service. From cell phone technology to high speed internet, America is no longer a world leader, and the airlines certainly don’t seem to be doing much to move the US up in the rankings.

Social Networking on the Big Screen

Monday, September 28th, 2009

Earlier this year, reports of a new movie by Columbia Pictures about social networking started to surface.  Mashable.com asked, “More than 200 million of us are active Facebook users, but will that social networking addiction convert to a blockbuster movie? Columbia Pictures sure hopes so, as it advances its plan to bring Facebook’s founding story to the big screen.”

The movie, titled “The Social Network”, already had some big names attached to it. Talks were in progress to put David Fincher, the director of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, in the director’s chair, according to Variety. And Aaron Sorkin, screenwriter of A Few Good Men, The American President, Malice, and Charlie Wilson’s War, penned the script, based on the book ““The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, A Tale of Sex, Money, Genius and Betrayal.“.

Then this past week, the L.A. Times reported that the latest addition to “The Social Network,” is pop star Justin Timberlake, slated to play Sean Parker, a co-founder of Napster (not Sean Fanning, the music site’s creator, just so we’re clear) and Facebook’s first president. We see the musical connection, and we’re okay with it.

Timberlake will play alongside Jesse Eisenberg of “Adventureland” and “The Squid and the Whale”, who will take on the role of Facebook’s founder Mark Zuckerberg, who was 19 when he created “The Facebook” in his humble Harvard dorm room.

The film will apparently a techno version of VH1’s “Behind the Music”, teaching us all that fame and fortune, especially  when acquired with internet speed, is not all just fun and games.

Google Books Deal a Do Over

Friday, September 25th, 2009

We may have announced the time to rejoice over Google Book’s settlement a wee bit too soon.  As Miguel Helft wrote for the NY Times on Thursday, “As currently written, the controversial settlement between Google and groups representing publishers and authors is officially dead.”  But before you start ringing the bells of mourning, it seems a federal judge gave the parties time to negotiate a new deal!  Yay!  And one that would address some of the many objections filed by various groups.

The Authors Guild and the Association of American University Presses sued Google in 2005. They felt that Google’s plan to scan books from major libraries and make them available online constituted copyright infringement. After two years of negotiations, the parties announced the settlement in October 2008.

Judge Denny Chin (of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, if you must know) granted a motion to delay an October 7th hearing on the settlement. The motion was filed earlier this week by the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers, the plaintiffs in the case, and was unopposed by Google, the defendant.

In his order, Judge Chin indicated that he took seriously the long list of objections that various parties have raised about the agreement.

“The current settlement agreement raises significant issues, as demonstrated not only by the number of objections, but also by the fact that the objectors include countries, states, nonprofit organizations, and prominent authors and law professors,” Judge Chin wrote. “Clearly, fair concerns have been raised.”

Instead of the scheduled fairness hearing, Judge Chin asked the parties to convene in court on October 7th for a status conference to “determine how to proceed with the case as expeditiously as possible, as this case has now been pending for more than four years,” he wrote.

So, readers of digital books, keep your fingers crossed for this to be resolved with internet speed!

Comedy takes over the Internet

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

An L.A. Times article tells us, “Americans need a laugh right now.” And, they say, according to comScore’s Media Matrix, humor sites on the web showed the biggest gains of all the categories and subject matter they tracked. “The category grew 21 percent in August to 33.7 million visitors, representing a high for the category in the past year.”  Humor is spreading with internet speed!

The most popular of these sites was Break.com, with nearly 5.6 million visitors which features video clips of accidental falls.  Perhaps this is because it can easily cross all language barriers.

The second most popular was the site for the cable channel Comedy Central with 4.4 million visitors. But even if you don’t get the channel, there are plenty of laughs to be had, with videos, jokes and games and info about their spotlights on stand-up comedians many shows.

National Lampoon Humor Network was next with 4.3 million–up 7 percent. Followed by Wimp.com, which is a collection clips that are suitable for all ages in a simple list format. Wimp.com saw significant growth during the month with a 58-percent increase.

Who knows what percentage of people are getting their comedy from YouTube, but they do have their own channel dedicated to it, and they seem to have some of the most popular videos on the site. 

They don’t seem to list sites beyond those, but a search done on Alexa.com showed Comedy Central as number one, followed by Comedy.com. We were surprised that we didn’t see Funny or Die.com, which has been mentioned on many social networking sites. It gives you a chance to vote for the funniest videos.

If Google got a Redesign

Monday, September 21st, 2009

WebMynd is a company that created an add-on that allows you to augment your Google searches with real-time Twitter updates, Wikipedia articles, YouTube videos, and results from dozens of other places. They’ve now launched a contest called RedesignGoogle.com that invites designers from around the world to give Google a makeover.

Designers are invited to revamp Google using any CSS modifications they’d like. The contest started accepting submissions already, and will continue to do so through November 1st. Then, a number of judges (which include Y Combinator’s Paul Graham, the WebMynd team and TechCrunch’s Jason Kincaid) will pick the best designs. The winners will take home a brand new MacBook Air. You can find more details on WebMynd’s blog.

Jason Kincaid says, “The nice thing about the contest is that it isn’t purely theoretical — you’ll actually be able to start using the new design in your browser, using a stripped down version of WebMynd’s browser plugin.” Now that’s working with internet speed!

You can see a full gallery of submissions thus far at RedesignGoogle.com.  But others are wondering if Google really needs a redesign.  Our Wired World blog says “It seems that the colour and image friendly Bing search is causing a stir in the imagination of Google users…. I like Google the way it is. Neat and simple.” And the Tech Superb blogger says, “Let me point out emphatically that Google is what it is today not only because of the highest quality of its search engine but also because of simplicity of its design.”

So sure, have fun, redesign Google for yourself, but maybe leave the original for everyone else.

Technophobia and the Internet

Friday, September 18th, 2009

Technophobia is the fear of technology, and it seems to be more prevalent than you might imagine in the case of the internet. The Internet Innovation Alliance pointed out these two stories to us.

First, In January of this year, the town of Glastonbury, England protested against receiving a Wi-Fi network after some residents blamed it for dizziness, headaches, and other ailments. In fact, an ONLINE petition lists  “headaches, dizziness, nausea, severe tiredness, brain fog, disorientation and loss of appetite, loss of balance, inability to concentrate, loss of creativity”.  At least we can tell they’re not total Luddites, they’ll still go online as long as it’s not wireless. 

Then, just this week, a story came out of Canada about a garlic farmer in Victoria Harbour, Nova Scotia, who is trying to stop the village from receiving high-speed Internet.

Lenny Levine, who has been planting and harvesting garlic by hand on his Annapolis Valley land since the 1970s, is afraid his organic crop could be irradiated if a microwave tower for wireless high-speed internet access is built a few hundred meters from his farm.  It’s expected that the council’s decision will be overturned because the radiation from the internet tower is 60,000 times lower than the government’s accepted limits for organic farms. A petition in support of the high speed internet tower was signed by the majority of householders in the area, but in the meantime, the people of Victoria Harbour are stuck with dial-up internet.

As The Internet Innovation Alliance  points out, these protests highlight the need for education when it comes to rolling out technology. Research needs to be done to reassure people. “After all, what’s the point of providing access if people don’t want — or are scared to — use it?”

Google Really Big in India and Brazil

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

“Google’s dominance of the Internet in the United States is hard to overstate,”  says Miguel Helft of the New York Times.  According to his information from comScore, in the U.S. Google is No. 1 in areas like maps and blogging, accounts for two-thirds of all Web searches, and they own YouTube which is 10 times more popular than its nearest competitor. Over all, Internet users in the United States spend 9 percent of their time online on some Google service. Globally this average is 9.4 percent.

But in two global markets growing with internet speed, Google is even more dominant. In terms of Internet use globally, India is ranked seventh, and Brazil ninth. But In Brazil, Google accounts for nearly 30 percent of people’s online minutes and about 29 percent in India.

Google’s social network, which has been a failure pretty much everywhere else in the world, is No. 1 in those two countries.

In Brazil, Google captures nearly 90 percent of all searches, 71 percent of the time spent on maps (compared with just 42 percent here in the U.S.) and 43 percent of the time spent on blogs (compared with 30 percent here).

In India, it represents 88 percent of searches, 64 percent of maps and 48 percent of blogs. Gmail accounts for nearly half of the Indian Web e-mail market, compared with just 6.4 percent in the U.S..

“Part of the explanation was that Google emerged onto the scene at the time these markets were developing,” says Andrew Lipsman, director of industry analysis for comScore. “As Google became the default search engine, the brand extended to these other services.”

But Google has not been able to beat local brands in China, the Internet market with the most users, where it lags behind Baidu. In Russia, Yandex is the leading search engine.

Social Radar may be a helpful Big Brother

Monday, September 14th, 2009

Social Radar, by Infegy, collects millions of articles and conversations from traditional media, social networks and blogs and captures them in a brand snapshot. As Read Write Web says, they know “when you’ve been bad or good.” 

This is a corporate version of what we talked about in our previous post, “Careful Job Seekers Think About Online Presence”, and was recently reinforced by President Obama in a Spetember 8th speech to a group of 14- and 15-year-old students. “I want everybody here to be careful about what you post on Facebook, because in the YouTube age, whatever you do, it will be pulled up again later somewhere in your life.”  An MSNBC slideshow gives examples of social networking cautionary tales.

Since January 2007, Social Radar has been crawling millions of pages and can compile a dossier-style picture of a company’s successes and flaws. Using the recent Domino’s Pizza disaster as an example, Social Radar shows a tag cloud of frequently used words, along with a percentage of negative and positive comments.

In this case, the opinions toward Domino’s Pizza went from good to bad in mid April, with internet speed, when two Domino’s Pizza workers in North Carolina uploaded a YouTube video of their less-than-sanitary kitchen antics. (Visit Read Write Web to see a news story video). While the employees were both fired and the franchise was closed for sanitation, the brand’s social stock still took a nose dive in both traditional and social media.

Such information can be helpful because Social Radar can be used to measure the success of their campaign to recapture consumer confidence. Other uses include the success of product launches or political campaigns…maybe even trading decisions, with their ratings of Fortune 500 companies and top brands across the web.

Watching TV on your PC

Friday, September 11th, 2009

The L.A. Times Tech blogger, David Colker pointed us to a survey by the nonprofit Conference Board that was released this week. It shows that almost 25% of households in the U.S. now watch their TV shows online.  That’s up from 20% who watched television programs on the computer last year.

Nearly 80 percent of consumers rely upon their high-speed internet for entertainment daily. In fact, entertainment is cited as one of the most important Internet activities, behind only personal communication and work-related activities. 

This quarterly Consumer Internet Barometer survey found that news programs are viewed by 43% of online watchers—who might want their news with internet speed, rather than waiting for scheduled programs. 35% watch sitcoms, comedies and dramas. Then it goes down to 19% who view reality shows and 18% favoring sports (that number might be higher if more live sports events were shown free online).

And Hulu.com is fast becoming the hot site – just behind YouTube.com – for watching TV programs. In fact, the number of households visiting Hulu.com has increased almost fourfold in the last year. Offering shows from NBC, ABC, Fox and others, Hulu didn’t debut until March 2007.

Consumers are moving away from “appointment” TV, preferring to watch programs whenever they choose. Being able to view favorite shows at any time, along with personal convenience, are the two major reasons cited by more than half of consumers for turning to online TV. Consumers also cite portability as another benefit.

“Online viewing allows users to watch TV on their own schedule, catch up on missed content and focus on their favorite programs,” says Lynn Franco, Director of The Conference Board Consumer Research Center. “As result, about 20 percent of consumers say their traditional TV viewing has declined.”

Facebook Makes You Smarter than Twitter Does

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Or so says Dr Tracy Alloway from the University of Stirling in Scotland.  She’s an expert in working memory– the ability both to remember information and to use it—and believes it to be far more important to success and happiness than IQ.

For example, at a job interview, a candidate will employ working memory to match answers to questions in the most impressive way.

In an article in The Telegraph UK she explains that using Facebook employs and strengthens these skills…with internet speed, as does playing video war games and solving Sudoku. But text messaging, micro-blogging on Twitter and watching YouTube are all considered likely to weaken one’s working memory.

The reasoning is that video games that involve planning and strategy, and may also train working memory, Dr Alloway believes. ”I’m not saying they’re good for your socialization skills, but they do make you use your working memory,” she said. ”You’re keeping track of past actions and mapping the actions you’re going to take.” But the “instant” nature of texting, Twitter and YouTube was not healthy for working memory.

”On Twitter you receive an endless stream of information, but it’s also very succinct,” said Dr Alloway. ”You don’t have to process that information.

”Your attention span is being reduced and you’re not engaging your brain and improving nerve connections.”

She said there was evidence linking TV viewing with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) while extensive texting was associated with lower IQ scores.

Ben Patterson, a Yahoo Tech Blogger said, “Of course, that’s just Alloway’s theory; there’s no evidence in the Telegraph article of any studies proving that Facebook users are brainiacs compared to Twitter fanatics.”  Plus, he says, if you’re actively engaging other users, or just passively reading, this may make more of a difference than what service you use.